On a detailed assessment of costs a reduction in hourly rates of the incurred costs is not a 'good reason' to depart from the budget in respect of the budgeted (future) costs.
Court of Appeal addresses arguments relating to defective, co-existing and implied retainers, as well as deed of rectifications relating to conditional fee agreements.
Celebrity litigants Brian May and Anita Dobson win significant recoverable costs uplift as circuit judge questions Master Rowley’s proportionality decision.
Court of Appeal decides that a pre-April 1 2013 CFA was novated when a claimant agreed to instruct a replacement firm – but that LASPO transitional rules allow their success fee to be recovered regardless.
The High Court has affirmed that in order to comply with the strict requirements of the Solicitors Act 1974 a statute bill must be a complete and self-contained bill for costs including all disbursements incurred during the period covered.
Warby J considers the application of CPR 36.13 (4)(b) and (5) following acceptance of a defendant's Part 36 Offer out of time
Chief Master Marsh considers the purpose and effect of commenting on incurred costs at a costs management hearing under CPR 3.15 and PD 3E.
Davis LJ endorses Master Whalan’s approach to detailed assessment where costs budgets have been agreed or approved
Coulson J warns against parties adopting an unrealistic approach to costs budgeting and in particular with regards to Precedent R.
Carr J: “On a detailed assessment on a standard basis, the costs judge is bound by the agreed or approved cost budget, unless there is a good reason to depart from it.”
Our occasional e-Newsletters are a concise, useful and convenient source of information relevant to our clients.
"I just wanted to express my deep gratitude to TM Costings for their handling of my case from start to finish. Toby and Ruth were both very sympathetic and understanding of the way my case and fees had been handled by my previous Matrimonial Solicitors. Throughout, they were always on top of my case and understood what had taken place with such clarity. Through their professionalism and outstanding knowledge of the law and case law, their negotiations with the other side resulted in them agreeing to settle Out of Court securing one hundred percent of what I had previously been overcharged, along with all of the legal fees I had paid in trying to get this matter resolved! I was personally recommended to use their services and would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone who finds themselves in a position where they feel the legal fees they have been charged are either not fair or transparent."Sarah Margetts