Sales LJ sets out the Court of Appeal’s policy regarding costs security when a party demonstrates a 'deliberate reticence' about its financial position, and the relevance of any court approved costs budget in the calculation of an appropriate sum
A circuit judge had no discretion to refuse a 10 per cent uplift to successful legally-aided claimant, because their claim did not fall within the singular Simmons v Castle exception.
The Court of Appeal has ruled that costs awarded to successful Part 36 claimants in RTA portal claims can be recovered on the indemnity basis and not limited to the less generous fixed costs regime.
Litigants may be forced to choose between abandoning claims or representing themselves if LAA funding decisions cannot be made within appeal timeframes – even for judicial review claims.
HHJ Pelling QC exercises caution in the absence of "express or implied agreement of the parties" to indicate whether, or not, he would have been prepared to approve an increase in the Defendant's approved costs budget had an application been made pre trial.
CFA rendered unenforceable due to its failure to comply with the Conditional Fee Agreements Order 2013 following assignment
Claimant permitted to switch to a CFA / ATE arrangement, despite their previously-obtained CLS funding certificate remaining in force
A claimant’s decision to surrender their legal aid funding in favour of a CFA rendered unreasonable due to their solicitor’s failure to give advice regarding the post LASPO landscape
Access to Justice Act costs rules did not breach ECHR, court decides in majority verdict
Warby J reduces defendant’s proposed legal budget by more than a quarter, claiming the reduced sum will still allow them to undertake a “proper” defence.
Our occasional e-Newsletters are a concise, useful and convenient source of information relevant to our clients.
"Can I just take this opportunity to thank you, you have done a splendid job in a short amount of time in limited hours. We are very grateful."F Khan - London