Costs Lawyers, Draftsmen & Consultants, call 01628 526236

Case Law

  • Instruction of London Solicitors


    The master had been entitled to take into account the claimant's age and the urgency of his case when deciding that it had been reasonable for him to instruct solicitors in central London in respect of his personal injury claim against the Ministry of Defence.

    Read the full article...

  • Costs of Preliminary Issue


    A master had erred in assessing costs awarded on a preliminary issue at nil on the ground that the receiving party had ultimately failed very badly in its case. The costs order had been intended to deal with the costs of the preliminary issue as a discrete set of costs, irrespective of the overall fate of the action.

    Read the full article...

  • Preliminary CFA Investigations


    A firm of solicitors was entitled to assess a claim for clinical negligence that was accepted under a conditional fee agreement as having a 50% chance of success, which allowed it to charge a 100% success fee. The claim was of a kind that had uncertain prospects, and based on what the solicitors knew when the fee agreement was made, the claim could easily have been assessed as having chances of success lower than 50%.

    Read the full article...

  • Third Party Costs Order


    Where family had funded a claimant's litigation, there was a reasonable prospect of success in obtaining a third party costs order where the family were directly concerned with the facts of the claim, had taken an active role and gained a benefit from the litigation, and had sought to control its course.

    Read the full article...

  • Costs Protection


    During any time when a litigant acted in person they were not a legally assisted party within the meaning of the Legal Aid Act 1988 s.17. That extended to any period after their solicitors had ceased to act for them and had communicated that to the opponent's solicitors, even if a period of time then elapsed before they took any active steps as a litigant in person.

    Read the full article...

  • N252 - Multiple Solicitors


    Where a party was entitled to its costs, it had to include all of its costs on the bill for detailed assessment. If that party was entitled to recover the cost of instructing more than one solicitor, it had to include the costs of each solicitor separately in the bill and, if it failed so to do, could not claim a separate assessment in respect of the costs of the solicitor omitted.

    Read the full article...

  • Apportionment


    On the facts, the Judge had been entitled to apportion costs in line with the Claimant's liability in a road traffic accident as he had had proper regard not only to the Claimant's claim, but also the Defendant's notional cross-claim; the exercise of his discretion could not therefore be criticised.

    Read the full article...

  • Retrospective CFA


    A retrospective success fee in a retrospective conditional fee agreement was not contrary to public policy.

    Read the full article...

  • Recoverability of inquest costs in a civil claim


    This is an important decision concerning the recoverability of costs incurred during an inquest in later civil proceedings. It affects clinical negligence, personal injury and HRA practitioners alike. TMC were instructed by Hodge Jones & Allen in the case of Roach and attended before Master Hurst on the assessment of costs. Andrew Post of Hailsham Chambers represented them on the Claimants' successful appeal to the High Court.

    Read the full article...

Subscribe to newsletter

Our occasional e-Newsletters are a concise, useful and convenient source of information relevant to our clients.


"I can highly recommend T M Costings for their responsive service and high standards. Toby has a very detailed knowledge and understanding of costs and also gives excellent advice in negotiations. He has built up a great team."
Vivien Gambling - for Lambeth Law Centre

Want to find out more?

If you have any questions, please get in touch - we are happy to help.

Contact us