The full force of the post Jackson costs management regime and the new stricter application of Rule 3.9 was felt in August 2013 with Master McCloud's judgment in Andrew Mitchell MP v News Group Newspapers Limited, concerning the Sun Newspaper's coverage of the 'Plebgate' affair. Relief was sought from sanctions imposed by Master McCloud in June 2013 for Mr Mitchell's failure to engage in attempts to discuss budgets and budgetary assumptions (PD51D para 4.1) and a failure to comply with PD 51D para. 4.2 namely a failure to file and exchange a budget no later than 7 days prior to the CMC. The sanction was that Mr Mitchell would be limited to a budget consisting of the applicable court fees for his claim.
Relief was sought on several grounds including the fact that:
Master McCloud was unpersuaded, determining that...
"The explanations put forward by the Claimant’s solicitors are not unusual ones. Pressure of work, a small firm, unexpected delays with counsel and so on. These things happen, and I have no doubt they happened here. However even before the advent of the new rules the failure of solicitors was generally not treated as in itself a good excuse and I am afraid that however much I sympathise with the Claimant’s solicitors, such explanations carry even less weight in the post Jackson environment...
"Budgeting is something which all solicitors by now ought to know is intended to be integral to the process from the start, and it ought not to be especially onerous to prepare a final budget for a CMC even at relatively short notice if proper planning has been done. The very fact that the Defendants, using cost lawyers, were well able to deal with this in the time allotted highlights that there is no question of the time being plainly too short or unfairly so..."
The Master gave leave to appeal of her own motion in view of the absence of authority on precisely how strict the courts should be and in what circumstances.
Our occasional e-Newsletters are a concise, useful and convenient source of information relevant to our clients.
"Tom Winyard is very experienced and knowledgeable in this minefield of costing. He is a very effective communicator and handheld me every step of the way in my dealings with the most aggressive unethical opposing counsel. When the world caved in on me, it was Tom who step-by-step and patiently built the picture to protect his client. After hiring 4 law firms, waste of money and time and did not even achieve anything close to what Tom can offer. It would certainly be detrimental too to any suffering party not to hire Tom Winyard because I have certainly called almost 40 costs firms in London and had no joy with them. Thank you Tom, we will be forever indebted. We are grateful and we thank God for enabling us to find Tom to salvage the most painful event."Linda Chin - Singapore